Cross collateralization is a phrase used when collateral from one loan is reused further as collateral for another loan, thereby increasing the leverage for the borrower and increasing the lending capacity of the bank or the lender. It is specifically implemented when an asset or multiple assets collateralize one or more loans.
In this process, if the borrower cannot repay the loan on time, the lender can extract the money by liquidating the borrower’s assets. While borrowing money, it is necessary to ensure that the sanctioned loan is not cross-collateralized unless expressly agreed upon. It increases the borrower’s risk, even though it benefits the lender.
A cross-collateralization loan is the one in which the lenders use the collateratized assets of one loan to secure another loan which the same borrower has taken. Sometimes borrower fail to take note of this fact and end up managing a higher risk against their loans.
The cross-collateralization clause, in simple terms, converts multiple single loans into a single loan wherein a single asset or group of assets are bundled together to act as collateral for the loan. However, it is much more than just an implementation mechanism in practice. It helps a borrower, whether a retail borrower or a corporate firm, unlock the value of fixed assets, increase the leverage, get a lower interest rate, and better tax benefits.
With so many advantages, there is also a catch. Over-collateralization can lead to stressed assets and investors losing ownership of the collateral if the loan payments are delayed. Hence, one should understand the pros and cons of such a sophisticated mechanism before opting for it. In fact, because of such dependence on assets and how they have been valued in the loan documents, cross-collateralization clause attracts the scrutiny of the regulators.
Let us look at the various types of cross-collateralized loans.
Based on the mechanism in which it has been implemented, cross-collateralization loan can be further classified into two major categories: -
Let us consider the scenario of a gentleman named Ross who wants to buy a property whose current value is $15 million. Consider the case when Ross has only $2 million as available cash. He wants to take the loan for the remaining amount. However, per the bank’s policy, a minimum LTV (loan to value) ratio of 80% is required to sanction any loan. Hence, Ross cannot qualify for the loan in such a scenario. (This is summarized as scenario 1 in the following table.)
Scenario 1 | (in Millions) |
---|---|
Market Value of Property | 15 |
Available Cash | 2 |
Loan to Value Requirement | 80% |
Required Cash for Loan Eligibility | 3 |
Differences | 1 |
Car Loan be Granted | No |
Consider the scenario when Ross has another property whose equity value is $1 million. Using this information, the bank can unlock the potential value of this asset as the total ($2 million + $1 million) now passes the LTV test of the bank. Hence, Ross can be granted the loan. (This is summarized in scenario two below)
Scenario 2 | (in Millions) |
---|---|
Market Value of Property | 15 |
Available Cash | 2 |
Loan to Value Requirement | 80% |
Required Cash for Loan Eligibility | 3 |
Equity Value of Another Property | 1 |
Differences | 0 |
Car Loan be Granted | Yes |
Effectively cross-collateralization helped increase the leverage and removed any liquidity crunch for Ross.
Given below are a few benefits of cross-collateralization.
The following are some disadvantages of cross-collateralization: -
Cross Collateralization is the process of taking two loans secured by one asset whereas in cross default the default provision is applicable on one loan if the borrower defaulted on the other. However, let us look at the differences.
Cross Collateralization | Cross Default |
---|---|
It is related to loan collateralization. | It is related to loan default. |
Two loans are secured by one collateral. | Default of one loan automatically lead to default of the all other loans. |
It analysis the mortgage and indebtedness of borrower. | It analyses the credit worthiness of the borrower. |
Cross collateralization occurs when a lender uses one asset, such as a home, to secure multiple loans, such as a mortgage and a home equity line of credit. Cross default occurs when a borrower defaults on one loan, and the lender uses this as a trigger to default on other loans that the borrower has with the same lender.
2. Is cross-collateralization legal?Cross-collateralization is legal, but it can have significant implications for borrowers. When a borrower agrees to cross-collateralization, they essentially allow the lender to use multiple assets as collateral for a loan. This can limit the borrower's ability to sell or transfer assets, as the lender may have a claim on them.
3. What is cross-collateralization vs. stand-alone?Cross collateralization refers to using multiple assets to secure a loan, while stand-alone refers to a loan secured by a single asset. Stand-alone loans may offer more flexibility and less risk but may also come with higher interest rates or stricter terms depending on the lender's risk assessment.
This article is a guide to what is Cross Collateralization. We explain it with examples, difference with cross default, along with features and types.. You can learn more about financing from the following articles: -
Join Wallstreetmojo Youtube